Jan
31
2012
Was the climate change email fraud just a red herring to smear global warming scientists?
By admin
Phil Jones and others have been smeared. According to the international panels statement “the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact” climate change is still a fact. What did the emails show. Nothing.
East Anglia and the Climate Research Unit (CRU) have been cleared and can proceed with the quality research on global warming. Now that this has blown over, should we all get on with Ktoto and beyond?
Ahahahahahhahahaaahhhahhahahahhaha…. jeez, all I can do is laugh here. Ahahahahha… Why in the hell would these guys deliberately make themselves look so… ahhahahahahahha… Some defense here.
I hope you’re not planning on continuing in law school after you’re done being an “average college student.” Then again, maybe you should.
No one said the climate was not changing. The Earth has been in a state of climate change for its entire 4 billion year life.
What is fake are the conclusions and how they they arrived at them.
JD
If you represent all average college students, I fear for the future.
seems like a good idea
BELIEF CANNOT change REALITY
Global warming is one of the greatest frauds in history. Al Gore has made millions off of it and right now 30,000 scientists are suing him over global warming fraud. Plus the founder of the weather Channel says its a fraud watch this video. Your teaches have brainwashed you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQvsf2MUKRQ
Oh, so all of a sudden this panel makes everything OK?
The Institute of Physics was not so kind
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7046036.ece
Global warming due to pollution is a fact that we can all observe. The earth has warmed more in the pat 50 years than in the past it would take over 200 million years to change the same amount. The ozone layer is broken for the first time in the earth’s history creating the greenhouse effect, a term the Bush administration has banned the media from using. The oil companies will do anything with their trillions of dollars to deny it exists, but we can see the snowcaps at the poles melting and all the evidence due to the carbon in the atmosphere and the chopping of the rainforest so yes, it was a smear campaign to discredit legitimate scientists compared to the ones funded by the oil companies. Whoever believes the organizations funded by big oil over real scientists are I guess weak minded and delusional lamb.
As far as East Anglia and the Climate Research Unit (CRU), let’s take a look at who created that “research” department (pay attention to any names that sound like big oil)
The CRU was founded in 1971 as part of the university’s School of Environmental Sciences. The establishment of the Unit owed much to the support of Sir Graham Sutton, a former Director-General of the Meteorological Office, Lord Solly Zuckerman, an adviser to the University, and Professors Keith Clayton and Brian Funnel, Deans of the School of Environmental Sciences in 1971 and 1972.[4][5] Initial sponsors included British Petroleum, the Nuffield Foundation and Royal Dutch Shell.[5] The Rockefeller Foundation was another early benefactor, and the Wolfson Foundation gave the Unit its current building in 1986.[4] Since the second half of the 1970s the Unit has also received funding through a series of contracts with the United States Department of Energy to support the work of those involved in climate reconstruction and analysis of the effects on climate of greenhouse gas emissions.[6]
I rest my case.
Global Warming is the red herring. Yes, the world is being polluted but specifically global warming is not the danger. The world heats and cools all the time, the only reason it is as cool right now is because of ancient meteor impacts.
Duh. Not that the facts will sway any of the people who believe it’s a hoax.